All data is current as of 2013, unless otherwise noted.
Return to the list of all States & Territories.
Read about a particular aspect of the right to counsel in California by clicking on the heading for that issue. Or [Expand All] to see and print from one location all of the facts about the right to counsel in California, then [Collapse All] whenever you need to do so.
How the right to counsel is administered and structured
Branch of government: judicial
Trial level indigent defense services are the responsibility of county governments in California.
Representation of individuals in direct appeals and post-conviction proceedings, in both capital and non-capital cases, is a function of the California courts system. The state courts contract with a number of non-profit corporations to provide oversight and training on their behalf.
How the right to counsel is funded
Percentage of local funding: 90%
Percentage of alternative funding: 0%
Local governments must shoulder the entire financial burden of providing trial-level public attorneys to the poor. For California’s more affluent counties, this has not proven to be a problem for the most part, and some of the most respected public defender offices and assigned counsel systems in the country are in California. San Mateo County, for example, has been recognized as having institutionalized the American Bar Association’s Ten Principles and for providing consistent, zealous advocacy on behalf of the clients they serve. For less affluent counties, however, substantial state restrictions placed on the counties over the past 35 years have limited their ability to raise revenues. This, combined with the long list of county government responsibilities, makes it difficult for indigent defense services to rise to the top of the triage list in most of the California counties.
The methods used to provide public counsel
Each county in California determines for itself the method(s) it uses to provide an attorney to indigent defendants at the trial court level.
For direct appeals and post-conviction cases, the California courts system contracts with a number of non-profits and private attorneys.
Appellate representation in non-capital cases is divided among the state’s six appellate districts. Each of the six Courts of Appeal contracts with a non-profit appellate project to qualify, train, and provide resource assistance to the panel of private lawyers handling appointments on behalf of indigent clients on direct appeal. The appellate projects are: First District Appellate Project; California Appellate Project Los Angeles (2nd appellate district); Central California Appellate Program (3rd and 5th appellate districts); Appellate Defenders, Inc. (4th appellate district); and Sixth District Appellate Program.
In death penalty appeals and post-conviction proceedings, the non-profit California Appellate Project – San Francisco (CAP-SF) was established in San Francisco by the State Bar of California in 1983 as a resource center for private attorneys taking capital cases on direct appeal and onward through habeas corpus proceedings. CAP-SF operates under contract from the Judicial Council of California. The state of California supplemented CAP-SF in 1998 with the creation of the Habeas Corpus Resource Center, an arm of the state courts that provides direct representation to individuals in death penalty habeas proceedings before the Supreme Court of California and the federal courts. HCRC also provides training and accreditation assistance for private attorneys looking to become qualified to handle appointments in capital post-conviction proceedings. The Office of the State Public Defender, originally created in 1976 as a statewide appellate defender office under the judicial branch of government, was defunded in the 1980s and now handles only a limited number of post-conviction death penalty cases each year.
California Constitution, art. 1, § 15
Source of data: original research conducted by Sixth Amendment Center staff.